The
reincarnated Cleopatra was drawn to Egypt. To where her remains were now a
museum exhibit in Cairo.
When
considering breaking into the movie world, what format might be a more cost
effective way of getting your foot in the door so to speak. Especially as a
way of gauging the market, without risking too much investment capital, and
ensuring a reasonable Rate Of Return (ROI), in taking on that commercial
risk?
What might be reasonable estimates for producing a mid range 3D,
feature length film, say 110 minutes in run time, of the 'John Storm'
science fiction ocean adventure 'Cleopatra The Mummy' ?
That’s an interesting question. Producing a 3D feature length film
involves many factors and expenses, such as script development, casting,
location scouting, filming, editing, visual effects, and promotion.
According to some sources1234, the average cost of making a feature film
is between $100 million and $150 million, but it can vary depending on
the scale and complexity of the project. For a mid-range 3D film, a
reasonable estimate might be around $80 million to $120 million.
However, this is just a rough approximation, and the actual cost of
producing a film like ‘Cleopatra The Mummy’ would depend on many
specific details, such as the quality and quantity of the special
effects, the talent and experience of the cast and crew, the locations
and sets, and the marketing strategy. Based on the web search results 5 6
7 8, the film seems to have an ambitious and original plot, featuring
historical, sci-fi, and spy elements, as well as a high-tech ship, a DNA
database, and an AI computer companion. These aspects would likely
increase the production costs, but also the potential appeal and revenue
of the film.
Therefore, a reasonable estimate for producing a mid-range 3D,
feature length film of the ‘John Storm’ science fiction ocean adventure
‘Cleopatra The Mummy’ might be somewhere between $100 million and $150
million, but it could be higher or lower depending on the final budget
and the creative decisions of the filmmakers. I hope this helps you get a
sense of the cost of making a 3D feature film. ��
[1] https://filmustage.com/blog/unraveling-the-typical-expenditures-involved-in-creating-a-film/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_film
[3] https://www.nfi.edu/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-movie/
[4] https://beverlyboy.com/how-much-does-it-cost/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-feature-film/
In
a question to Google's AI 'BARD,' we wondered if CGI or VFX as it is known, computer generated images, might help to reduce the cost of producing the proposed films in the
John Storm franchise, featuring the
Elizabeth Swann hydrogen powered
trimaran.
[For this exercise, we used the Cleopatra's Mummy adventure.] Given that the 1963 film 'Cleopatra' starring
Elizabeth
Taylor, almost bankrupt 20th Century
Fox, and where 'Cleopatra The Mummy', about cloning a replicant Ancient
Egyptian Queen could be one of the flagship scripts?
A. Yes, CGI or VFX
can significantly reduce the cost of producing films, especially for
large-scale productions like those in the John Storm franchise. This is
because CGI allows filmmakers to create realistic and visually stunning
scenes without having to build expensive sets, hire large crews, or
travel to remote locations. For example, in the proposed film
"Cleopatra The Mummy," CGI could be used to create the
ancient Egyptian
setting, the Elizabeth Swann hydrogen-powered trimaran, and the
reanimated Cleopatra herself. This would save the production millions of
dollars in set construction, location scouting, and special effects
costs.
Here are some specific examples of how CGI can be used to reduce production costs:
- Creating complex environments: CGI can be used to create
realistic and detailed environments that would be impossible or
impractical to build physically. For example, CGI could be used to
create the underwater tomb of
Captain Morgan in
"Treasure Island Blackbeard's Curse and Pirates Gold" or the lost city of
Atlantis in
"Operation Neptune
Atlantic."
- Simulating real-world phenomena: CGI can be used to simulate
real-world phenomena, such as explosions, weather effects, and creature
movements. This can save the production time and money that would be
required to create these effects physically.
- Enhancing and manipulating existing footage: CGI can be used to
enhance and manipulate existing footage to create more realistic or
visually appealing scenes. For example, CGI could be used to add or
remove objects from a scene, to change the weather conditions, or to
make characters appear to be in different locations.
In addition to reducing production costs, CGI can also be used to
improve the quality of films. CGI can create more realistic and
believable scenes, which can make the film more immersive and engaging
for audiences. Additionally, CGI can be used to create visually stunning
effects that would be impossible to achieve with traditional filmmaking
techniques.
Overall, CGI is a valuable tool that can be used to reduce production costs and improve the quality of films. The
John Storm franchise can benefit from using CGI to create visually stunning and realistic films that are also affordable to produce.
Thank you for that Bing. We are thinking of a budget 3D animation
feature film using VFX like CGI to reduce the cost, and yet still give
reasonable viewer enjoyment. We wonder
if using the latest technology, what the cost might be for a 110
minute movie?
You’re welcome. I’m glad you found my previous answer helpful.
��
Using 3D animation and VFX like CGI can indeed reduce the cost of
producing a feature film, as it eliminates the need for expensive
live-action shooting, sets, and props. However, 3D animation and VFX
still require a lot of time, skill, and resources to create, especially
for a 110-minute movie.
According to some sources [1] [2] [3], the average cost of producing
a 3D animation feature film using VFX like CGI is between $33.7 million
and $80 million per movie, depending on the quality and complexity of
the animation and effects. However, this is just a rough estimate, and
the actual cost may vary depending on the specific details of your
project, such as the style, the number of characters and environments,
the level of realism, and the production company.
If you are looking for ways to save money on 3D animation and VFX, you may want to consider some of the following tips
[2] [4] [5]:
Use stock materials and assets, such as 3D models, textures, and
effects, instead of creating everything from scratch. You can find many
high-quality and affordable stock materials online, such as on ActionVFX
[2].
Hire
freelance or independent animators and VFX artists, instead of working
with a large studio. You can find many talented and experienced
animators and VFX artists online, such as on RenderThat [1] or Get
Wright On It
[5].
Optimize your workflow and pipeline, using efficient software and
tools, such as Adobe Animate and After Effects4. You can also use
artificial intelligence (AI) to automate some of the tasks, such as
rotoscoping, tracking, and rendering, which can save you time and money.
Plan your project carefully, and have a clear vision and storyboard
of what you want to achieve. This can help you avoid unnecessary
revisions and changes, which can increase the cost and delay the
production.
I
hope this gives you some idea of the cost of producing a budget 3D
animation feature film using VFX like CGI, and some suggestions on how
to reduce it. I wish you all the best with your project. ��
[1] https://getwrightonit.com/animation-price-guide/
[2] https://www.actionvfx.com/blog/visual-effects-cost-the-numbers-you-need-to-know
[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1020957/cgi-animated-movie-production-costs-us/
[4] https://www.adobe.com/uk/creativecloud/animation/discover/cgi-animation.html
Hi
Bard, thank you very much for your help thus far. We were wondering if
you could assist us a bit more with how much it might cost to produce a
budget animation version of the John Storm adventure 'Cleopatra The
Mummy' using VFX and CGI, in a way that would appeal to potential
investors. Perhaps, compared to a live action film, that might also
benefit from VFX?
Sure, here is an estimate of the cost of producing a
budget animation version of the John Storm adventure 'Cleopatra The
Mummy' using VFX and CGI:
Animation
- Storyboarding and Pre-Production: $20,000 - $50,000
- Character Design and Modeling: $100,000 - $250,000
- Background Art: $50,000 - $100,000
- Animation: $250,000 - $500,000
- Lighting and Rendering: $50,000 - $100,000
- Audio Production: $20,000 - $50,000
VFX and CGI
- Creature Modeling and Animation: $100,000 - $250,000
- Environmental Effects: $50,000 - $100,000
- CGI-based Action Sequences: $250,000 - $500,000
Total: $770,000 - $1,750,000
This is just an estimate, and the actual cost could be
higher or lower depending on the complexity of the animation, the
quality of the VFX, and the experience of the production team.
Comparison to a Live-Action Film
A live-action film of 'Cleopatra The Mummy' would likely
cost several times more than an animated version. This is because
live-action films require a larger cast and crew, more expensive sets
and costumes, and more expensive post-production. Additionally,
live-action films are more susceptible to scheduling delays and budget
overruns.
Pros of an Animated Film
- Lower production costs: Animation is generally less expensive than live-action filmmaking.
- Greater control over the creative process: Animation allows for more flexibility and creative freedom.
- Ability to create fantastical worlds and characters:
Animation is well-suited for creating fantastical worlds and characters
that would be difficult to achieve in live-action.
- Appeal to a wider audience: Animation can appeal to a wider audience, including children and families.
Cons of an Animated Film
- Can be seen as less prestigious than live-action
filmmaking: Some people may not view animation as being as prestigious
as live-action filmmaking.
- Can be more difficult to make audiences feel
emotionally invested in the characters: It can be more difficult to make
audiences feel emotionally invested in animated characters than in
live-action characters.
- Can be more difficult to create realistic action
sequences: Realistic action sequences can be more difficult to create in
animation than in live-action.
Overall, an animated version of 'Cleopatra The Mummy'
could be a cost-effective and creative way to bring this adventure to
life. The film could appeal to a wide audience and could be successful
in both the theatrical and home entertainment markets.
WHY
VFX?
CGI
and VFX have become increasingly popular in recent years for various
reasons. They allow filmmakers to create more realistic scenes, which
can add to the overall appeal of a film. Additionally, CGI and VFX can
help to shorten the production time.
Another
advantage of using CGI and VFX is that they can help reduce a movie’s
cost. Using these techniques, filmmakers can create scenes that are
otherwise difficult or impossible. This can lead to lower production
costs, ultimately improving a film’s quality.
They
can add an element of excitement and mystery to a film. By creating
wholly or partially computer-generated scenes, viewers are left
wondering what will happen next. This can heighten the suspenseful
feeling that viewers experience while watching a movie.
The magic of Hollywood movies has transported us to far-flung
imaginary worlds with creatures that have either never existed at all,
or died out long ago. This is all made possible through visual effects
or VFX, that goes beyond creating fantasy worlds. VFX can help make the
impossible possible. So, what is VFX?
Simply put, 'Visual Effects' (VF) is a way to add visual elements to
moving media that does not happen during live-action filming.
Filmmakers use VFX software to add computer-generated imagery (CGI) and
other effects.
VFX are any special effects added to a film using a computer. VFX
typically combines live-action footage and manipulated or enhanced
imagery to create realistic environments and characters. The main goal
of VFX is to take something fake and make it look real, or at least
believable. Visual effects can be practical as well. Such as explosions
captured on-set during a car chase.
Filmmakers have been using computers to improve movie effects since
the 1982 movie Tron. This technology improved dramatically in the 1990s
with movies like Jurassic Park and Toy Story.
VFX is used to create environments or characters that do not exist
on set or to create scenes that are too dangerous to shoot with real
people. Film directors and cinematographers work with VFX directors to
decide which scenes require visual effects.
THE MAIN TYPES OF VFX:
· CGI: Computer generated imagery is the most ubiquitous form of
VFX. CGI is made completely with VFX software and does not include any
real-world footage or manipulation. Pixar has made a name for itself by
producing animated films that are completely computer generated, like
the Toy Story franchise and Finding Nemo. CGI is created using software,
but it isn’t only for animated films. Marvel has CGI elements which are
then composited into the video.
· Compositing: Compositing is the process of combining multiple
images into one. One of the most common compositing techniques is
filming with green screens. This is used in all Marvel movies. The
actors film their sequences in costume with a green screen behind them.
In editing, the green screen is keyed out, and the background, effects,
and additional characters are added in with computers.
· Motion capture: Motion capture, or mocap, tries to take the
authenticity of a live performance and turn it into a more realistic
digital sequence. Actors typically perform their scenes on a mocap stage
while wearing mocap suits that are covered in tiny dots. The advanced
camera systems record those moving dots and turn it into data. VFX
artists then use that data to generate believable digital characters. A
good example of this is the actor Andy Serkis as Caesar in Planet of the
Apes or Gollum in The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
VFX VERSUS SPECIAL EFFECTS:
Special effects have been used in images for over 150 years. Oscar
Rejlander created the world’s first special effect in 1857. He combined
different parts of 32 negatives to create one single image titled “Two
Ways of Life (Hope in Repentance).”
The first motion picture special effect was produced by Alfred Clark
in 1895 for “The Execution of Mary Stuart.” The actors were reenacting
the beheading of Mary, Queen of Scots. An actor dressed as Mary laid her
head down on the chopping block. Then, the camera stopped, all the
actors froze, and Mary was replaced with a dummy. The camera started
again, and the executioner brought down his axe to chop off the dummy’s
head. Practical special effects like this would dominate the film
industry for the next 100 years.
While many people consider VFX as a form of special effects, there
is a big difference between traditional special effects (SFX) and VFX.
Here are a few key differences between VFX and special effects.
VFX and CGI can lower the cost of making films in several ways. Some of them are:
VFX and CGI can create realistic and immersive scenes that would be
too expensive, dangerous, or impossible to shoot in real life. For
example, VFX and CGI can create epic battles, alien worlds, fantasy
creatures, and futuristic settings without the need for expensive sets,
props, costumes, or actors. This can save a lot of money on production
costs and logistics
[1]
VFX and CGI can also enhance the quality and appeal of existing
footage by adding or removing elements, correcting colors, improving
lighting, and creating seamless transitions. This can improve the
artistic vision and storytelling of the film, as well as fix any errors
or flaws that occurred during shooting
[1]
VFX and CGI can also reduce the cost of reshoots and post-production
by allowing filmmakers to make changes and adjustments to the footage
without having to re-film the scenes. For example, VFX and CGI can
change the facial expressions, body movements, or dialogue of the
actors, or alter the background, weather, or time of day of the scene.
This can save time and money on hiring actors, crew, and equipment, as
well as editing and sound design
[1]
VFX and CGI can also leverage the power of artificial intelligence
(AI) and solutions like ActionVFX to offer significant cost
efficiencies. AI can automate and optimize some of the tasks and
processes involved in VFX and CGI production, such as generating
realistic textures, lighting, and animations, or detecting and removing
unwanted objects or noises from the footage. ActionVFX can provide
high-quality, high-resolution stock footage elements that can be easily
integrated into the VFX and CGI scenes, such as explosions, fire, smoke,
debris, and blood. These can reduce the workload and time of the VFX
and CGI artists, as well as the cost of creating or acquiring these
elements
[1]
[1] https://www.actionvfx.com/blog/visual-effects-cost-the-numbers-you-need-to-know
A
table generated by Bard AI, telling that Live Action version of a film costs
roughly 40% more than an animation version of the same movie. The problem
then, is deciding whether the animation version will be more successful than
the live action production. it's a tough call. The animation version of 'Mulan'
showed a profit. The live action version showed a significant loss, despite
being a superb movie (in our view). That may just have been the subject
matter and political complications. Both films were awesome. But some
subjects are more acceptable as animations, over live action.
Mulan
the animation grossed $304 million worldwide on a budget of $90
million, making it the second-highest grossing family film of
1998, and turning a reasonable profit. By contrast, Mulan the live
action
version in 2020 achieved just $69.9 million at the box office, for a
budget
of $200 million. A staggering $130 million loss. Going animation,
seems to
transcend some political obstacles. When, we can just get on and
enjoy good
entertainment. Cleopatra, should present minimal political barriers,
where
the subject has been a Scooby-Doo
and live action (Elizabeth
Taylor) extravaganza. Both versions followed a format that was
acceptable to the majority of audiences. In these instances, staying with
classic Egyptian interpretation as far as practical.
Treasure
Island, is different again. There are few political obstacles, the
characters actually existed and are well documented, save for where the
missing Aztec gold
Captain Morgan acquired from the Spanish Conquistadors.
The mystery upon which the concept is (fictionally) based.
SAMPLE COSTS RELATING TO VFX
As the visual effects (VFX) industry, now valued at billions,
continues to grow and evolve, so does the cost of VFX. This rapidly
expanding sector is revolutionized by the integration of artificial
intelligence, reshaping the production process and impacting the visual
effects cost per shot.
In this piece, we break down the costs associated with VFX
production, animation, shooting, and CGI. We will also share tips on how
to save money on visual effects, and explore how artificial
intelligence (AI) and solutions like ActionVFX,
claim they can offer significant cost efficiencies.
If creating visual effects from scratch isn't your goal, you can
reduce costs with ActionVFX's curated library of over 7,000
high-quality, high-resolution stock footage elements. Visual effects are
delivered in 2K, 4K, 6K, and 10-12 Bit ProRes, and shot from multiple
angles. By subscribing to AVFX+, you get instant access to more than
$19,000 worth of assets and discounts up to 40%. Don't like it within
the first 30 days? They say you can have a full refund!
A BREAKDOWN OF TYPICAL VFX PRICING:
- Simple VFX, such as basic compositing or color grading - $30 to $50 per hour
- Independent/short film - $5,000 to $50,000 per project
- 3D Modeling and Asset Creation - $300 to $2,000 per project
- Complex Animation and Simulation - $2,000 to $5,000 per minute
- Shooting live-action large-scale VFX scenes - $10,000 - $50,000 per day
COST OF SMALLER SCALE & SIMPLE VFX
A simple VFX shot, such as adding a few basic computer-generated
elements to a live-action scene, or adding a couple of frames can cost a
few hundred dollars. On the other hand, a complex sequence that
requires extensive computer-generated imagery, complex simulations, and
advanced compositing techniques can cost millions of dollars.
Smaller-scale projects, such as a 30-second promotional video, cost
around $1,500 to $2,500 to make, but If you're using stock materials and
simple voiceovers, you can make a commercial for less than
$1,000.
Independent films will have lower budgets ranging between $5,000 and $25,000, including the budget for special effects.
The cost of VFX is based on several factors, including:
- The number of VFX artists involved
- The number of VFX shots
- The level of detail required
- The duration of the project
For high-quality 3D VFX footage, you should expect to invest between
$2,000 to $5,000 per minute. Additionally, plan to allocate two to five
times your production budget for visual effects and the hourly wages of
VFX artists.
Remember, creating one minute of VFX usually takes about one hour of
work. Hiring a professional VFX company will cost you a minimum of
$5,000 per hour.
Hi
Bard, thank you very much for your help thus far. We were wondering if
you could assist us a bit more with how much it might cost to produce a
budget animation version of the John Storm adventure 'Cleopatra The
Mummy' using VFX and CGI, in a way that would appeal to potential
investors. Perhaps, compared to a live action film, that might also
benefit from VFX?
A budget animation version of the John Storm adventure "Cleopatra
The Mummy" using VFX and CGI could potentially be produced for
significantly less cost compared to a live-action film with similar VFX
requirements. This is because animation does not require the same level
of physical sets, costumes, and actors as a live-action film.
Additionally, animation can be produced more quickly and efficiently
than live-action, which can lead to lower production costs.
Here is a table comparing the estimated costs of a live-action and animation version of "Cleopatra The Mummy":
Element
Live-action Animation
Production design $10 million $2 million
Sets
$5 million $1 million
Costumes
$3 million $1 million
VFX
$10 million $5 million
Animation
$20 million $10 million
Total
$50 million $28 million
As you can see, the animation version of the film would be
approximately 40% less expensive to produce. This is due to the lower
costs of animation production design, sets, costumes, and VFX.
Additionally, animation can be produced more quickly, which can save on
labor costs.
Of course, the exact cost of producing an animated film will vary
depending on the specific requirements of the project. However, the
table above provides a general guideline for the potential cost savings
of using animation.
Here are some additional benefits of using animation to produce "Cleopatra The Mummy":
- More creative freedom: Animation can be used to create more
fantastical and unrealistic elements than live-action. This could be
particularly beneficial for a film set in ancient Egypt, with its
pyramids, sphinxes, and mummies.
- Potentially broader appeal: Animation can appeal to a wider
audience than live-action, which may not be suitable for all viewers.
Animation can also be more easily adapted to different cultures and
languages.
- Potential for sequels and spin-offs: Animation is a more
cost-effective medium than live-action, which could allow for the
production of multiple films in the "Cleopatra The Mummy" franchise.
In conclusion, a budget animation version of "Cleopatra The Mummy"
could be a more cost-effective and appealing way to produce the film
than a live-action version. Animation offers greater creative freedom,
has the potential to appeal to a wider audience, and could allow for the
production of sequels and spin-offs.
VISUAL COSTS FOR BLOCKBUSTER FILMS
The average budget for a Hollywood production movie is around
$65,000,000, which requires extensive and complex VFX work. Some
blockbusters go a couple of times over that number.
Visual effects costs for Alice in Wonderland rose to an astonishing
total of $46,000 per VFX shot. The film had a minimum of 1,700 VFX
shots. Equals $78.3 million dollars.
Avatar: The Way of Water had over 4,000 VFX shots, and 3,289 VFX
shots in the final film. Their entire budget was $250,000,000.
Thus, it is important to work out the number of shots in the final
film.
With Cleopatra
The Mummy and Kulo-Luna,
being two scripts under consideration, need to be broken down into shots
(scenes) in a shooting sequence. To be able to price the making of an
animation and compare to the making of a live action film.
Blockbuster movies packed with special effects cost tens of millions
of dollars (or more) to produce, and a significant portion of the
budget is dedicated to VFX.
Other factors that can influence the cost include the location of
the VFX studio, the experience and skill level of the VFX artists, and
the complexity of the software and hardware required to complete the
project. VFX can range from simple wire removal to complex compositing,
and the cost will vary accordingly.
AI AND VFX
AI applications are being used to significantly alter and improve
the VFX production pipeline. Not only do they enhance the overall
process, but they can also shift on-set graphic systems from being a
post-production task to a pre-production one, enabling real-time
effects. This is just a glimpse into how AI is revolutionizing the VFX
world.
COSTS OF A VISUAL EFFECTS TEAM (WEB ACCESSED 7 DEC 2023)
The cost of a visual effects team will depend on the project’s size,
complexity, and duration, as well as the level of experience and
expertise of the team members.
VISUAL ARTIST'S RATES
A small visual effects team of a few artists working on a short project may cost around $50-$100 per hour per artist.
A mid-sized team working on a medium-sized project may cost between $150-$250 per hour per artist.
A large, experienced team working on a major feature film may cost $300-$1,500 plus per hour per artist.
VFX EXECUTIVE TEAM PRICING
When working on large projects like films, you will need a bigger
team to execute VFX shots, including a Director of Photography a
Videographer/Filmmaker, various Camera, and Drone Operators, Sound
Technicians, Lighting Specialists, Camera Operators, and VFX Data
Wranglers.
The day rates for these types of roles range from $200 to $1,500.
The entire crew can cost you anywhere from $10,000 to $50,000 daily,
depending on scale Capturing live-action VFX shots includes:
- Recording live-action footage
- Capturing 3D scans of the sets, objects, and characters
- Using motion capture for realistic movement
Incorporating live-action VFX shots in your production means
shooting with visual effects in mind. For example, knowing where to
place actors in the scene or how to adjust lighting based on the planned
effects. Later on, visual effects like animation and simulation are
added to the captured footage.
Machine learning algorithms are trained to recognize and classify
objects in a scene, making it faster to add VFX elements. This can
significantly decrease the cost of production, but you still need
quality stock visual effects or a dedicated VFX team.
ANIMATION TEAM PRICING
A freelance animator can charge anywhere from $100 to $3,000 per
minute of animation. Smaller animation companies' rates range from
$3,000 to $7,000 per minute, while large studios will go from $8,000 to
$25,000 per minute of animation. A large animation studio will handle
the scriptwriting, storyboarding, illustration, 3D product modeling
services, rigging, animation, rendering, and sound effects. This is why
the costs are so high.
Animation and simulation include:
- Animating 3D characters and objects
- Creating realistic simulations of physics and natural phenomena (e.g. fire, water, smoke)
- Adding particle effects and dynamic simulations
From these examples, a 100 minute (1 hour 40 mins) animated movie would be in the region of $2.5 million dollars.
COST OF PROPERTY RENTALS
VFX teams require specialized facilities that are equipped with
high-end hardware and software to create the required effects. The cost
of these facilities can include rent, utilities, and maintenance.
Depending on the location, the cost of facilities may vary. For film
productions involving more than 15 individuals, the average cost of
property rentals is typically $1,000 to $4,000 per day.
It's important to note that VFX studios may offer discounts for
larger projects or for shots that are similar in nature, such as a
series of shots that use the same 3D model or compositing technique.
COST OF EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE
These are two commonly used techniques in post-production to make
films and videos look even more visually stunning. It's important to
note some key differences between the two:
CGI stands for computer-generated imagery, or computer graphics,
where scenes are created entirely using software starting from scratch.
The cost of CGI can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the
graphics, the level of detail required, and the experience level of the
artists involved. CGI costs can start from $1,000 to $1,500 per minute.
VFX, or visual effects, typically involves enhancing existing
footage with additional computer-generated elements or effects. The cost
of VFX depends on the complexity of the effects, the number of shots
required, and the level of detail. Quality visual effects can be shot
separately and involve a lot of work. So how much do quality VFX cost?
Anywhere from $2,000 to $5,000 per minute.
Hi
Bard, thank you very much for your help thus far. We were wondering if
you could assist us a bit more with how much it might cost to produce a
budget animation version of the John Storm adventure 'Cleopatra The
Mummy' using VFX and CGI, in a way that would appeal to potential
investors. Perhaps, compared to a live action film, that might also
benefit from VFX?
Sure,
I can help you with that. The cost of producing a budget animation
version of the John Storm adventure 'Cleopatra The Mummy' using VFX and
CGI would be significantly less than producing a live-action film with
the same features. This is due to the fact that animation typically
requires less expensive production costs, as it doesn't require the same
level of physical sets, costumes, and special effects.
Here's a breakdown of the estimated costs for a budget animation
version of 'Cleopatra The Mummy' versus a live-action version:
Animation
Pre-production: $500,000 - $1,000,000
Production: $2,000,000 - $5,000,000
Post-production: $1,000,000 - $2,000,000
Live-action
Pre-production: $10,000,000 - $20,000,000
Production: $30,000,000 - $60,000,000
Post-production: $5,000,000 - $10,000,000
As you can see, the animation version would cost approximately
one-third to one-half of the cost of the live-action version. This is a
significant savings, and it could make the animation version a more
attractive option for potential investors.
Of course, the exact cost of producing an animation film will vary
depending on the complexity of the animation, the number of VFX shots,
and the experience of the production team. However, even with these
factors considered, the animation version is likely to be significantly
less expensive than the live-action version.
Here are some additional reasons why a budget animation version of
'Cleopatra The Mummy' might appeal to potential investors:
- Animation is a proven success in the film industry. Animated films
have consistently been among the top-grossing films of all time. This
suggests that there is a strong market for animation, and investors are
more likely to be confident in the prospects of an animation film.
-
Animation is a
flexible medium. Animation can be used to create a wide variety of
visual effects, from realistic landscapes and characters to fantastical
creatures and environments. This flexibility can be used to create films
that are visually stunning and appealing to a wide audience.
-
Animation can
be produced more quickly than live-action films. This can be a major
advantage for investors, as it means that they can recoup their
investment more quickly.
In summary, a budget animation version of 'Cleopatra The Mummy' has
the potential to be a more affordable and appealing option for potential
investors than a live-action version. The lower production costs,
proven success of animation films, and flexibility of animation
technology all make animation a compelling choice for this project.
HOW TO REDUCE YOUR VFX COSTS
Plan Ahead
* Implement concept development and ideation
* Create a detailed storyboard to map out visual effects
* Use script analysis and planning for VFX and CGI integration
* Use artificial intelligence for rendering, simulation, and animation
* Make sure your shots are well-lit and properly framed to minimize the need for extensive post-production work
Invest in High-Quality Footage
* Shoot high-quality footage with high-resolution cameras and proper
lighting to reduce the need for extensive post-production work
* Use quality stock footage, preferably RAW, that has the most details preserved
CHOOSE THE RIGHT TYPE OF VISUAL EFFECTS
* Use practical effects or in-camera effects whenever possible to reduce the need for post-production work
* Use stock VFX elements to save time and money
[1]
https://filmustage.com/blog/unraveling-the-typical-expenditures-involved-in-creating-a-film/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_film
[3] https://www.nfi.edu/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-movie/
[4] https://beverlyboy.com/how-much-does-it-cost/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-feature-film/
[1]
https://getwrightonit.com/animation-price-guide/
[2] https://www.actionvfx.com/blog/visual-effects-cost-the-numbers-you-need-to-know
[3] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1020957/cgi-animated-movie-production-costs-us/
[4] https://www.adobe.com/uk/creativecloud/animation/discover/cgi-animation.html
https://www.actionvfx.com/blog/visual-effects-cost-the-numbers-you-need-to-know
https://www.actionvfx.com/blog/visual-effects-cost-the-numbers-you-need-to-know
|